Legal Opinion

Zak v. Fidelity-Phenix Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 26, 1965No. Gen. 49,710Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

58 Ill. App.2d 341 (1965)

208 N.E.2d 29

Joanne Zak, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Fidelity-Phenix Insurance Company, a Corporation, (Successor to the Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company of New York, a Corporation), Defendant-Appellee.

Gen. No. 49,710.

Illinois Appellate Court — First District, First Division.

April 26, 1965.

Rehearing denied May 20, 1965.

George C. Rabens, of Chicago, for appellant.

Clausen, Hirsh, Miller & Gorman, of Chicago, for appellee.

2Opinion of the Court · MurphyJustice Murphy

This is a declaratory judgment action based on an automobile liability insurance policy, issued by defendant to plaintiff and cancelled by defendant…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The City of Chicago v. BarnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Dorfman v. GerberIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Leslie v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  4. Coons v. Home Life Insurance Co. New YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Scapes v. OrrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API