Edmond v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
MANN, Chief Judge.
We consider the rule to be that if all the counts are good, and such as on which judgment can be awarded, and the evidence warrants the conviction, to pass judgment on the cotmt charging the highest grade of offence;
Cribb v. State, 1861, 9 Fla. 409, 416.
For more than a century the Supreme Court of Florida has adhered with constancy, with the single apparent exception of Steele v. Mayo, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 386, which we now understand more clearly and discuss herein, to the so-called single transaction rule, limiting punishment to the gravest of those several offenses into…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Edmond v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973