Bemont v. Isenhour
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
Defendants challenge plaintiff’s right to recover by motions to nonsuit and by request for a directed verdict on the issues of negligence and contributory negligence. The questions raised by the motions and by the request to charge are the same. They are: (1) Was plaintiff a mere licensee to whom the only duty owing was not to willfuly or wantonly inflict injuries, or did defendants owe her the duty of exercising reasonable and ordinary care; (2) Does the evidence suffice to show lack of ordinary and reasonable care on the part of defendants; and (3) Does the evidence necessarily lead to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pafford v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Brigman v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Watkins v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Diamond v. McDonald Service StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Dennis v. City of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Raper v. McCRORY-McLELLAN CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Long v. National Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Jackson v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Morgan v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.