Legal Opinion

Bemont v. Isenhour

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 29, 1958No. 238PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Defendants challenge plaintiff’s right to recover by motions to nonsuit and by request for a directed verdict on the issues of negligence and contributory negligence. The questions raised by the motions and by the request to charge are the same. They are: (1) Was plaintiff a mere licensee to whom the only duty owing was not to willfuly or wantonly inflict injuries, or did defendants owe her the duty of exercising reasonable and ordinary care; (2) Does the evidence suffice to show lack of ordinary and reasonable care on the part of defendants; and (3) Does the evidence necessarily lead to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pafford v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Brigman v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Watkins v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Diamond v. McDonald Service StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Dennis v. City of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Raper v. McCRORY-McLELLAN CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Long v. National Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Jackson v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Morgan v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API