Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Berardi

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1987No. 1618PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

Appellant was charged with violation of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, 35 P.S. 780-113(a)(30), and proceeded to trial on November 21, 1985. Following two days of testimony, the jury was left to deliberate. However, on November 23, 1985, the trial court declared a mistrial for manifest necessity insofar as the jury was unable to reach a verdict. The case was then called for retrial. Appellant filed a motion to dismiss alleging that the trial court erred in declaring a mistrial, and as a result, Appellant was being placed in double jeopardy. This motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. LearnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Com. v. Gomez, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Com. v. Perez, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. Reed, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API