Legal Opinion

Michell v. Louisiana State Board of Optometry Examiners

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 28, 1963No. 46549PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Justice.

John H. Michell, a qualified and duly licensed optometrist in Louisiana, instituted the present declaratory judgment proceeding. He alleged that because his employer, Pearle Optical, Inc., was not the holder of a Louisiana optometrist’s license, he was threatened with the imminent loss of his right to practice his profession as an employee of Pearle Optical, Inc., and that he was adversely affected by the following rule and regulation of the Louisiana State Board of Optometry Examiners (Hereinafter designated as Board):

“* * * THEREFORE, the Board has unanimously adopted the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Plebst v. Barnwell Drilling CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  3. Olan Mills, Inc. of Tennessee v. City of BogalusaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. Michell v. Louisiana State Board of Optometry Exam.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Michell v. Louisiana State Board of Optometry Exam.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vance v. FordhamUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. City of New Orleans v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  3. McCrory v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. Akin v. Louisiana State Board of Optometry ExaminersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  5. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API