Legal Opinion

Valenti v. Board of Review

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 8, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The Board of Review of the Unemployment Compensation Commission determined that plaintiff, Anna Valenti, was eligible for one month's benefits and ineligible thereafter, on the ground that she had refused suitable employment without good cause. Plaintiff appeals from the Board's determination.

The appeal is submitted on a stipulation of facts, which may be summarized as follows: Plaintiff worked for a period of twenty-three years in the trade of hand sewing and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Pusey Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. W. T. Grant Co. v. Board of Review of the Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  4. Muraski v. Board of Review of the Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Maryland Employment Security BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  2. De Rose v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API