Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Muraski v. Board of Review of the Unemployment Compensation Commission

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 23, 1948PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

Certiorari was granted to review the judgment of the Board of Review of the Unemployment Compensation Commission holding that prosecutor was ineligible for benefits under section 4(c) of the Unemployment Compensation Act, as amended by chapter 114 of the laws of 1941 (Pamph. L., p. 257), which provides that an individual totally or partially unemployed shall be eligible to receive such benefits only if it appears that “(c) He is able to work, and is available for work.” R. S. 43 :21-4(c), as amended. This conclusion was made to rest upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beaman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Higgins v. Bd. of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Boyer v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Radice v. N.J. Department of Labor and IndustryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  5. Worsnop v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Emp. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API