Claim of Crockett v. F.T. Coppins & Sons
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Cochrane, P. J.:
The awards were made as appears from the findings because of total permanent disability. The case must, therefore, be considered with reference to section 15, subdivision 1, of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant has lost the use of his right foot but not the entire use of the left foot. The case depends then on the last sentence of the subdivision, viz.: “ In all other cases permanent total disability shall be determined in accordance with the facts.” At the time of the accident claimant was fifty years old. He walks with the aid of crutches. Only one witness was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Osterlund v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Claim of Bernstein v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Yocum v. Union Builders Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923