Legal Opinion

Claim of Crockett v. F.T. Coppins & Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cochrane, P. J.:

The awards were made as appears from the findings because of total permanent disability. The case must, therefore, be considered with reference to section 15, subdivision 1, of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant has lost the use of his right foot but not the entire use of the left foot. The case depends then on the last sentence of the subdivision, viz.: “ In all other cases permanent total disability shall be determined in accordance with the facts.” At the time of the accident claimant was fifty years old. He walks with the aid of crutches. Only one witness was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Osterlund v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  2. Claim of Bernstein v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Yocum v. Union Builders Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API