Legal Opinion

Smitherman & McDonald, Inc. v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co.

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided June 9, 1925No. 6622PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRIEBER, District Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Arkansas Railroad Commission requiring the appellant to establish reasonable freight rates and to maintain reasonable facilities for shipping all commodities over its line to and from tbe oil fields, on its line of railroad to tbe junction of tbe appellant’s line with tbe Missouri Pacific Railroad at Reader, Ark., and to file annual reports with tbe Arkansas Railroad Commission as provided by law. Tbe order is based on tbe following findings of the Railroad Commission:

“Now on this 15th day of April, 1925, tbe commission after…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Producers Transportation Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. The Pipe Line CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. United States v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arizona Corp. Commission v. Reliable Transportation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Ensco, Inc. v. Weicker Transfer & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. Ensco, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Weicker Transfer and Storage Co., and Third-Party v. Warren Jaycox v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Third Party Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API