Legal Opinion

Thornton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 22, 1930No. A-7653PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Osage county of the crime of burglary, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for seven years.

Defendant contends first that the court erred in overruling his motion to quash the information, upon the ground that the findings of the examining magistrate were insufficient to authorize the filing of the information in the district court.

When the case was called for trial, defendant filed his motion to quash the information, which motion reads as follows:

“Comes the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HalbertCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Tarkington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Thornton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Crum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Schrack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Thornton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API