Legal Opinion
Hensel v. City of Utica
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 21, 2014PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by a corrected order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County [David A. Murad, J.], entered Aug. 19, 2013) to review a determination of respondents. The determination denied *1218petitioner’s application for General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits.
It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination that he is not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clouse v. Allegany CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Bernhard v. Hartsdale Fire DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barkor v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- BARKOR, ADOLPHUS v. CITY OF BUFFALOAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Barkor v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- FRANZ, DAVID v. D'AMBROSE, MARTINAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Redmond v. Town of HaverstrawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.