Legal Opinion

Bernhard v. Hartsdale Fire District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1996PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Fire Commissioners of the respondent Hartsdale Fire District dated June 7, 1994, which adopted the recommendation of a hearing officer, made after a hearing, finding that the petitioner is not entitled to benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-a.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, a firefighter who qualifies for a disability pension pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law § 363-c is not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sutka v. ConnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. King v. City of NewburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Flynn v. ZaleskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Maresco v. RozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. D'Onofrio v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Miserendino v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Solano v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. D'Onofrio v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Hensel v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Matter of Delgrande v. Greenville Fire Dist.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API