Legal Opinion

State v. Swanson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 8, 2003No. C993911CR; A113676PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant appeals her convictions for possession and delivery of methamphetamine, a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4)(b). Before trial, she moved to suppress evidence resulting from an inventory of her vehicle, including all derivative evidence. She assigns error to the trial court’s denial of that motion. We reverse and remand.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Officer Passadore, who conducted the inventory, testified at the suppression hearing. Passadore testified that he stopped defendant’s vehicle for various traffic infractions. As Passadore approached the vehicle, he noticed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. MundtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. State v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. KeadyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. Cruz-RenteriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. CordovaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. HockersmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API