Legal Opinion
Faheem Rodgers v. Montium
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 21, 2026No. 2:25-cv-06848Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FAHEEM RODGERS, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 25-CV-6848 : MONTIUM, : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM Judge Juan R. Sánchez April 21, 2026 Pro se Plaintiff Faheem Rodgers brings this civil action asserting claims of employment discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. For the following reasons, the Court will grant Rodgers leave to proceed in forma pauperis and permit him the option of filing an amended complaint or proceeding…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.