Legal Opinion
Harford v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 13, 2002No. 1D01-1651PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
816 So.2d 789 (2002)
Nicolus D. HARFORD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D01-1651.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 13, 2002.
Stephen G. Cobb of The Cobb Law Firm, Shalimar, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Robert L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
Appellant, Nicolus D. Harford, pled nolo contendere to charges of possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia, reserving the right to appeal the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized by the arresting officer…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Doctor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- E.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Ingram v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Allen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Cole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.