Legal Opinion
People v. Day
New York District Court
Decided November 1, 1979PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Fertig, J.
The circumstances of this motion are relatively unique. This court could find no reported case where a similar motion was made during or at the end of trial.
*12At the end of trial, after both sides had rested, the defendant made a motion requesting that the testimony of the People’s witness, Louis Santorella, be stricken. The basis of that motion was that the People did not produce a statement taken from Mr. Santorella, by the police of Nassau County, on the date of the incident in question. The case involves an alleged assault by the defendant on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. LunneyNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. ChurbaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Corso, New York County Courts1985
- People v. ManzioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985