Legal Opinion

Chollar v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 30, 1954No. 517-53PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion per curiam:

Plaintiff was employed by the Military Sea Transportation Service as a chief engineer. He was discharged on May 17, 1952, but on appeal it was held that there was not sufficient cause to discharge him, and on September 22, 1952, he was notified that he was eligible for reemployment. He was reemployed on April 27, 1953. He sues for his salary in the interim, less the amount he had earned in other employment.

*339Plaintiff was in an “excepted” position. He did not come within the classified civil service; hence, he is not entitled to the benefit of the Act of August 24, 1912, 37…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Crenshaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  4. Jordan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fiorentino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Greenway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Sullivan v. StarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Umbeck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  5. Committee for Protection of First Amendment Rights of Department of Agriculture Employees v. BerglandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API