Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Snead

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 10, 1932No. 6 Div. 15PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoster, J.

The final decree from which the appeal was taken had no more effect than to reform the description of land in a deed executed by the respondents to complainant, and require the delivery of possession to complainant by respondents of the land so described, and that respondents be taxed with the costs of the cause.

The respondents are a married woman and her husband. No security or bond for the costs of appeal was given. The only appellant is the married woman, and she claims the right of appeal without bond or security by authority of section 6138 of the Code. That section provides for such an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hildebrand v. First Nat. Bank of FairfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Scott v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pritchett v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Ex Parte GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Ex Parte BurrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Low v. LowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Rosser v. RosserSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API