In re the Probate of the Will of Kaufmann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
McNally, J. (dissenting).
The decree should be affirmed.
In my opinion the evidence unexplained made permissible an inference in favor of the contestants. It was for the jury to say under all the facts and circumstances whether or not the acts of Weiss were artful and cunning contrivances which so overcame testator’s independent volition as to induce him to do what he otherwise would not have done. (Matter of Anna, 248 N. Y. 421, 427-428.) In the Anna case the Surrogate directed a verdict in favor of the will and the Court of Appeals held that where the unexplained evidence and circumstances…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Estate of AnnaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Mullen v. J. J. Quinlan & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- In re the Probate of the Will of SatterleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Van Kleeck v. PhippsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1879