Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Probate of the Will of Kaufmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 30, 1961Published

1Dissent

McNally, J. (dissenting).

The decree should be affirmed.

In my opinion the evidence unexplained made permissible an inference in favor of the contestants. It was for the jury to say under all the facts and circumstances whether or not the acts of Weiss were artful and cunning contrivances which so overcame testator’s independent volition as to induce him to do what he otherwise would not have done. (Matter of Anna, 248 N. Y. 421, 427-428.) In the Anna case the Surrogate directed a verdict in favor of the will and the Court of Appeals held that where the unexplained evidence and circumstances…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of AnnaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Mullen v. J. J. Quinlan & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of SatterleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Van Kleeck v. PhippsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API