American Nat. Bank of Austin v. Sheppard
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Motions for Rehearing and to Certify.
In view of our holding that the relief sought by the Bank is in fact mandatory and not restrictive, and that therefore the Supreme Court only has jurisdiction of the controversy under Art. 1735, R.C.S., the Bank now'urges for the first time (in addition to assignments upon which its appeal was, based and which we overruled) that Art. 1735, in so far as the jurisdiction therein conferred upon the Supreme Court is exclusive, is unconstitutional, in that it thereby “diminishes the full and plenary jurisdiction of the District Court to grant a writ of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Love v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1930
- Ladd v. YettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Daniel v. RichcreekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Kaufman County v. McGaugheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Hughes v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.