Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 15, 1913No. 1988PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

— This conviction was for theft of a bale of cotton over the value of fifty dollars, the punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.

The State’s contention is that the property belonged to L. L. Rogers. Appellant’s contention is that it did not, and the State failed to show ownership in Rogers. The State’s contention is the property was taken from the gin yard of a man named Tomson. The indictment alleges ownership in' Rogers and possession in Tomson. The theory of the State is, the bale of cotton was taken from Tomson’s gin yard…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knoll v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Van Meter v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Hilliard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Pate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Medford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API