Tidewater Management Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
This case comes before the court on plaintiffs exceptions to the recommended decision of Trial Judge David Schwartz, filed September 13, 1977, pursuant to Rule 134(h), having been submitted to the court on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration *72thereof, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth,* it hereby affirms and adopts the decision as the basis for its judgment in this case. It is, therefore, concluded that plaintiff is not entitled to recover and the petition is dismissed.
OPINION OF TRIAL JUDGE
Schwartz, Trial Judge:
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Heyer Products Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Sperry Flight Systems Division of Sperry Rand Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Continental Business Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Grumman Data Systems Corporation v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, and Intergraph Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Inc. v. Lloyd Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and at & T Federal Systems, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Grumman Data Systems Corporation v. Sheila Widnall, Secretary of the Air Force, and Contel Federal Systems, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Jill K. Massie, as Mother and Next Friend of Autumn Massie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Graphicdata, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.