Chaput v. Lussier

On exceptions. Actions for damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of the negligence of the servant of defendant in driving a public taxicab owned by defendant and operated in his business.

The cases were heard together by Referees who found for defendant in both. Objection was seasonably made to the acceptance of the Referees’ reports and written reasons for objection were filed in accordance with Rule 21, Revised Rules of Supreme Judicial and Superior Courts, 129 Me., 511. The reports were accepted and exceptions filed and allowed.

The facts are these. At the time plaintiffs sustained…