Legal Opinion

Lemke v. Rayes

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 15, 2006No. 1 CA-SA 06-0130PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALL, Judge.

¶ 1 Robert David Lemke seeks special action review of the superior court’s order denying his motion to dismiss his felony-murder charge before retrial as barred by double jeopardy and collateral estoppel principles. In denying Lemke’s motion, the superior court determined that: (1) there are no less er-included offenses of felony murder and therefore no other offenses constitute the “same offense” as felony murder for double jeopardy purposes; and (2) Lemke failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that the jury decided an ultimate issue of fact in his favor as required…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. KennebrewIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. State v. Le NobleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Robert Lemke v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API