Legal Opinion

Dillie v. Bisby

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 27, 1985No. 3-85-0391PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE HEIPLE

delivered the opinion of the court:

In this personal injury action, the defendants filed motions to dismiss with prejudice because of the plaintiff’s failure to exercise due diligence in obtaining service of process after the statute of limitations had run. (Supreme Court Rule 103 (87 Ill. 2d R. 103).) The plaintiff filed a motion for voluntary dismissal. The plaintiff’s motion was granted, and the defendants’ motions were denied.

On appeal to this court, we held that the orders granting the motion for voluntary dismissal and denying the motion to dismiss were not final…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dillie v. BisbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dillie v. BisbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Penrod v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Mancuso v. BeachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Martinez v. EricksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Highland v. StevensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Howard v. DruckemillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API