JRS Partners, GP v. Warren

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JRS PARTNERS, GP, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) NO. 3:17-cv-01258 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) CHRIS WARREN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to the only remaining Defendant, Brandy Warren (Doc. No. 169, “the Motion”),1 to which Defendant Warren (“Defendant”) has failed to respond. The Local Rules of Court provide that failure to file a timely response to a motion shall indicate that there is no opposition to the motion. Local…