Legal Opinion

Tozier v. Woodworth

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 30, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.

In 1934, plaintiff was chosen, and qualified, as collector of taxes in the Town of Unity. A tax collector is a public officer, owing to the public and not to the town alone, the duties imposed by statute. Thorndike v. Camden, 82 Me., 39, 44, 19 A., 95. The assessments committed to this collector included a tax on certain land and buildings, title to which appears to have, since the levying of the tax, come, by conveyance from the record owner, to defendant.

*47The instant action is assumpsit, plaintiff suing in his official capacity, for breach of an alleged express agreement, on the part of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nehalem Timber Co. v. Columbia CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Foster v. M. A. Metts & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Thorndike v. Inhabitants of CamdenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1889
  4. State ex rel. Cain v. H. D. Foote Lbr. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burkett v. YoungsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  2. Hooff v. PaineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  3. Capitol Bank & Trust Co. v. City of WatervilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  4. State v. Inhabitants of Swan's IslandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API