Legal Opinion

School District No. Five v. Everett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Ingham. (Gridley J.) Bill to compel delivery of deed in fee simple. Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The statute which defines the powers of school-district boards provides, among other things, that

“ They shall purchase or lease a site for a school-house, as shall have been designated by the district, in the corporate name thereof, and shall build, hire, or purchase such schoolhouse out of the fund provided for that purpose, and make sale of any site or other property of the district, when lawfully directed by the qualified voters at an annual or special meeting; provided, that the district shall not in any case build a stone or brick school-house upon any site, without having first obtained…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Salisbury v. FishNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  2. Folts v. HuntleyNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  3. Jackson ex dem. Hudson v. AlexanderNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  4. Beach v. HaynesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1840
  5. Stevens v. DewingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1830

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Myers v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lindlay v. RaydureDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1917
  3. Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. SchueckIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Thaw v. GaffneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Puffer v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API