Legal Opinion

People v. Aratico

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sheldon S. Levy, J.

Are unconditional stipulations concerning the admissibility of personal records of former codefendants — agreed to before a mistrial was granted as to defendant — binding upon him in this subsequent criminal prosecution? No reported case has previously come to grips with a similar problem.

Defendant Paul Aratico and two codefendants, Carl Gregorio and Albert Ryan, originally were indicted for crimes involving conspiracy, scheme to defraud and larceny in the apartment referral agency industry.

Upon the commencement of a prior trial on these charges, all…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Clason v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Stemmler v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Hine v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Pines v. BeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ColesNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. KellmanNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. BoyerNew York Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API