Legal Opinion

Martin Drive Corp. v. Thorsen

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 13, 2001No. AC 20056PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*768 Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The defendants James Thorsen and Maureen Thorsen1 appeal from that part of the judgment, rendered by the trial court, granting the plaintiff Martin Drive Corporation2 a permanent injunction prohibiting the defendants from using a certain right-of-way over Martin Drive for the benefit of a small part of their parcel of land. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly determined (1) that they do not have an express or implied easement over Martin Drive and (2) that the use of the easement to benefit the small part of their land about which there is an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Abington Ltd. Partnership v. HeubleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Carbone v. VigliottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Deregibus v. Silberman Furniture Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Russakoff v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. DiasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. Gerlt v. TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSORSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Kosnik v. BartonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API