Legal Opinion

United States v. Ninety-Five Firearms, Described in Exhibit A, and Curtis F. White, Claimant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 21, 1994No. 92-15780PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge TANG.

TANG, Senior Circuit Judge:

Curtis White (“White”), a licensed firearms dealer, appeals the forfeiture of ninety-five firearms seized by the Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms Service (“ATF”). The seizure and forfeiture resulted from White’s failure to maintain and retain firearms records. White argues that the statute and the regulation that required him to maintain and retain the records, 18 U.S.C. § 923(g)(1)(A) and 27 C.F.R. § 178.121(a), are unconstitutionally vague. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

BACKGROUND

White owned and operated a licensed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Julie Chalmers v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Abdelkader Helmy, United States of America v. James E. HuffmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Fin & Feather Sport Shop, Inc. v. United States Treasury DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1979
  4. United States v. Michael H. Weitzenhoff and Thomas W. MarianiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Audry Keith DeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. DrewDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
  2. Windwalker v. RichardsonDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API