Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Gould

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1939No. 27671PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff is in possession of the south half, and defendants of the north half, of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of section 35, township 25 north of range 1 east, two twenty-acre tracts of rather rough land in Kitsap county. Both tracts at one time belonged to one Hanson, who for many years resided upon the tract now owned by plaintiff. About 1915, Hanson sold the tract now owned by defendants to a Mr. Anderson, who allowed the property to remain vacant.

Plaintiff’s tract is somewhat higher than that owned by defendants, and contains about five acres of swamp land. Near the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rigney v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gustaveson v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Findley v. FindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hanson v. CarrWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Sparks v. Standard Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hayes v. GibbsUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  2. City of Olympia v. PalzerWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Alvin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Engel v. CatucciCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  5. Brasher v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API