Legal Opinion

Jones v. Hobbs

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 9, 2010No. 10-1754PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

On February 3, 2010, Arkansas death row inmate Jack Harold Jones, Jr., filed a motion to intervene in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action filed by Marcel Williams, another death row inmate, challenging the constitutionality of the Arkansas Method of Execution Act (“MEA”). Williams claimed, among other things, that the MEA violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. On March 2, 2010, the district court dismissed Williams’s § 1983 suit for failure to state a claim and denied as moot Jones’s motion to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Hill v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Nooner v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  4. Jones v. HobbsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2010

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Jack Jones, Jr. v. Wendy KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. Rhoades v. ReinkeDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2011
  4. Cooey v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Cooey v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API