W.C.B. v. State

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

This matter is before us on interlocutory appeal. Appellant-respondent W.C.B. argues that the juvenile court erred in denying his motion to dismiss. Specifically, W.C.B. contends that Indiana's child molesting statute1 (1) is inherently-and unconstitutionally-eon-tradictory, (2) is unconstitutionally vague, and (8) violates Article I, section 28 of the Indiana Constitution. Finding that the statute is constitutional as written and as applied to W.C.B., we affirm the judgment of the juvenile court.

FACTS

On February 10, 2005, the State filed a delinquency petition against…