State ex rel. Attorney General v. Heidorn
Supreme Court of Missouri
Quo Warranto.
1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.
By this information respondent is charged-with having usurped the office of county treasurer of St.. Louis county. By his answer he claims to hold the office-by virtue of his appointment, on the 27th day of September, 1881, by the county court of said county to fill a va*411caney in said office occasioned by the death of Frederick A, Heidorn on the 18th day of September, 1881. There was a demurrer to the answer, which presents the question to be determined.
By section 4, page 226, General Statutes of 1865, of the act in relation to county treasurers : “ In case of vacancy in the office of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
- City of Cape Girardeau v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Iverson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Andrews v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by24 opinions
- W. S. Forbes & Co. v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Strottman v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Mette v. FeltgenIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Aloe v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Paddock v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.