Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Attorney General v. Heidorn

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1881PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Quo Warranto.

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

By this information respondent is charged-with having usurped the office of county treasurer of St.. Louis county. By his answer he claims to hold the office-by virtue of his appointment, on the 27th day of September, 1881, by the county court of said county to fill a va*411caney in said office occasioned by the death of Frederick A, Heidorn on the 18th day of September, 1881. There was a demurrer to the answer, which presents the question to be determined.

By section 4, page 226, General Statutes of 1865, of the act in relation to county treasurers : “ In case of vacancy in the office of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  2. City of Cape Girardeau v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Iverson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Andrews v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. W. S. Forbes & Co. v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  2. Strottman v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Mette v. FeltgenIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Aloe v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  5. Paddock v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API