Legal Opinion
Billy Doyle Medford v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided June 15, 2000No. 03-97-00769-CRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
ON REMAND
NO. 03-97-00769-CR
Billy Doyle Medford, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 97-174, HONORABLE THOMAS KENYON, JUDGE PRESIDING
On original submission, we affirmed appellant Billy Doyle Medford's conviction for possession of cocaine, but reversed his conviction for escape and rendered a judgment of acquittal. See Medford v. State, 990 S.W.2d 799, 806-11 (Tex. App.--Austin 1999). The State petitioned for discretionary review, challenging our conclusion that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Medford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- United States v. Francisco Corral-Franco, Maria Guadalupe Corral-Franco, and Maria Aparis FrancoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Woods v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Lawhorn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.