Legal Opinion

Cotten v. Chambers-Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 2024No. 23AP-100Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Cotten v. Chambers-Smith,

2024-Ohio-1142.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Prince Charles Cotten, Sr., : Relator, : No. 23AP-100 v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Annette Chambers-Smith, Director, : Respondent. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on March 26, 2024 On brief: Prince Charles Cotten, Sr., pro se. On brief: Dave Yost, Attorney General, and John H. Bates, for respondent. IN MANDAMUS ON OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE’S DECISION JAMISON, J. {¶ 1} Relator, Prince Charles Cotten, Sr., pro se, brought this original action seeking a writ of mandamus ordering respondent,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Volbers-Klarich v. Middletown Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Fuqua v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Serv. Emps. Assn. v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State ex rel. Swanson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API