Legal Opinion

Battleday's Guardianship v. Heistand Heistand

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1936No. 26,572PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order requiring the guardian of Ellen Battleday to elect on behalf of his ward that she take under the law of the State of Indiana and not under the will of her deceased husband.

The guardian was appointed for Mrs. Battleday under section 8-301, Burns’ Ann. St. 1933, section 3472, Baldwin’s 1934, Acts 1911, ch. 218, §1, p. 533, which provides for the appointment of a guardian for a person “incapable of managing his estate or business affairs because of old age, infirmity, improvidence, or being a spendthrift.” Section 4 of the act provides that: “The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Andrews v. BassettMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Ambrose v. Rugg, Admx.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Heavenridge v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Pinkerton v. SargentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Harvey v. RodgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mead v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. Grammer v. BourkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API