Legal Opinion

Reinstine v. Rosenfield

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 8, 1940No. 7107PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

By this action in equity appellant Rein-stine, as executor of the will of Isaac Ros-enfield, deceased, sought an accounting and a recovery from the appellees, William, Morris and John Rosenfield, individually and as trustees under the will of Louis Rosenfield, deceased, and also Sarah M. Rosenfield, a widow, and Ethel R. Harris. After a joinder of issues and trial, the District Court, on May 1, 1939, dismissed the cause for want of equity. Subsequently, on September 25, 1939, the District Court made a finding of facts and rendered its conclusions of law thereon. On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bartle v. NuttSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Randall v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Dent v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Wheeler v. SageSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  5. Kine v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Edward Pastor and Martin WeinerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Gregory v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Schy v. Susquehanna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  5. Indemnified Capital Investments, Sa. v. R.J. O'Brien & Associates, Incorporated, John W. O'brien, Robert J. O'brien, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API