Commercial Casualty Ins. v. Tetz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This is an action by a surety company, appellant, to recover from its principal, appellee, the amount paid by it on account of a surety bond executed by it on behalf of the copartnership of Godfredson & Tetz, composed of C. Godfredson and R. Tetz, for the faithful performance of a contract for the construction of waterworks and for the payment of labor and other claims resulting therefrom for the town of La Conner, in the state of Washington.
In a suit prosecuted by appellant to determine its liability under the bond to various claimants, judgment was procured July 14,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burke MacHinery Co. v. CopenhagenOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Schumacher v. the Sumner Tele. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- McAdow v. Kansas City Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- McKallip v. GeeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- McLeod v. Morrison & EshelmanWashington Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.