Legal Opinion

Commercial Casualty Ins. v. Tetz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 20, 1936No. 7934Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an action by a surety company, appellant, to recover from its principal, appellee, the amount paid by it on account of a surety bond executed by it on behalf of the copartnership of Godfredson & Tetz, composed of C. Godfredson and R. Tetz, for the faithful performance of a contract for the construction of waterworks and for the payment of labor and other claims resulting therefrom for the town of La Conner, in the state of Washington.

In a suit prosecuted by appellant to determine its liability under the bond to various claimants, judgment was procured July 14,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burke MacHinery Co. v. CopenhagenOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Schumacher v. the Sumner Tele. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. McAdow v. Kansas City Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. McKallip v. GeeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. McLeod v. Morrison & EshelmanWashington Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API