American Plan Corp. v. Beckham
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrenceEvans, Judge
I concur in the judgment in this case, but I do not agree with the holding in Headnote 1 that in order for a defendant to prevail in a motion for summary judgment "the undisputed facts as'disclosed by the pleadings and proof must negate some essential element of plaintiff’s claim . . .” (Emphasis supplied.) I hold to the proposition that in order for a defendant to show he is entitled to a summary judgment, the pleadings and proof must "negate all (not some) essential elements of plaintiff’s claim.”
The majority opinion cites as authority Mion Constr. Co. v. Rutledge, 123 Ga. App. 777, supra,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scales v. PeevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Saunders v. VikersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Watkins v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Werbin & Tenenbaum, Inc. v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Calhoun v. EavesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.