Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 8, 1966No. 41869PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

In no sense does the Summary Judgment Act authorize the courts to sit as both judge and jury. General Gas Corp. v. Carn, 103 Ga. App. 542, 545 (120 SE2d 156); Davis v. Holt, 105 Ga. App. 125, 130 (123 SE2d 686). On motion for summary judgment the court is not authorized to try and resolve issues of fact; the function of the court, and its only authorized function under this procedure, is to determine the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. Code Ann. § 110-1203; Bagley v. Firestone Tire &c. Co., 104 Ga. App. 736, 739 (123 SE2d 179); Dewey v. Clark, 180 F2d 766,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. McCarty v. National Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Malcom v. MalcolmCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Bagley v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. General Gas Corporation v. CarnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Whisenhunt v. Allen Parker Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Hodges v. YoumansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Tingle v. Arnold, Cate & AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Corbitt v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Shadix v. DowdneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API