Legal Opinion

Ninow v. Loughnane

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 31, 1981No. 80-2343PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda

Subsequent to the entry of judgment by confession in favor of plaintiffs, defendants filed an amended petition to vacate the judgment (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 110, par. 72), or, alternatively, to open the judgment with leave to file an answer (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 110A, par. 276). The trial court denied the amended petition and confirmed the judgment by confession against the defendants. Defendants appeal.

The issues presented for review are: (1) whether the warrant of attorney upon which the confessed judgment was based was void; (2) whether the trial court erred in denying defendants’…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Weber v. PowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. First National Bank of Oak Lawn v. MinkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Grundy County National Bank v. WestfallIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Wolf v. GainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  5. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. ElderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kurti v. Fox Valley Radiologists, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Financial Management Services, Inc. v. Sibilsky & Sibilsky, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Pankau v. First State Bank of Harvard (In Re Pankau)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  4. People v. BeltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. USA Jet Airlines, Inc v. SchickMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API