Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 8, 2002No. CA CR 01-503Published

1ConcurrenceOlly Neal, Judge

I concur in reversing this case. However, I write separately to simply express my concern about the standard of review the State has asked us to apply. The State has asked us “to make an independent determination based on the totality of the circumstances and view the evidence in a light most favorable to the State.”

The standard of review for motions to suppress evidence obtained in warrantless searches is set forth in Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (1996), wherein the Supreme Court held that such cases should be reviewed de novo, and includes 1) “a determination of the historical…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Degler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Barnes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API