Legal Opinion

Cage v. F. P. Eastburn Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1929No. 9304Published

1Opinion

On Motions, for Rehearing.

Upon consideration of appellants’ motion for rehearing and a re-examination of the record, we have reached the conclusion that the evidence conclusively shows that neither 'Mrs. Baldwin nor the appellants under their contract of purchase and sale contemplated the purchase of less than the entire tract of land, and neither of them were willing to consummate the contract for only Mrs. Cage’s interest in the land.

Upon this state of facts the only ground upon which a portion of the judgment was remanded for a new trial by our main opinion is untenable, and appellants’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berg v. San Antonio Street Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Montgomery v. AmslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Willson v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Perkins v. CamozzeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Texas Interstate Realty Co. v. SmallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API