Legal Opinion

Boland v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided August 4, 1969No. Motion No. M-11936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGustave G. Rosenberg, J.

Claimant’s application is for permission to file notice of claim pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act, which reads: “ But if the claimant shall be under legal disability, the claim may be presented within two years after such disability is removed.”

Claimant contends that this legal disability continued until final discharge from the hospital on June 19, 1967.

The State, in opposing the filing of the claim, contends:

1. That claimant, while in Central Islip Hospital, became a voluntary patient on April 18, 1966, and as such was under no legal disability.

2. That “…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
  2. People ex rel. Kaminstein v. Brooklyn State HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Danna v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1955
  4. In re ButtonowNew York Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boland v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Boland v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Boland v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API