Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boland v. State of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1972No. Motion M-11936Published

1Dissent

Scileppi, J. (dissenting).

Claims asserted against the State by statutory prescription, under ordinary circumstances, are to be filed within 90 days of their accrual (Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd. 3). Where the claim is not filed within the statutory period, a delinquent claimant may seek relief Jby way of a motion to file ‘ ‘ a late claim ’ ’, addressed to the sound discretion of the court (Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd. 5); or, if disabled by reason of some recognized legal impediment — infancy, detention in a State institution, or insanity, even absent an adjudication of incompetency…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Edlux Construction Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Edlux Construction Corporation v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Dufel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. Sanford v. . SanfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Taylor v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API