Legal Opinion

In re Weinstein

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 4, 1961No. 53313PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYFIEL, District Judge.

This is a petition to review an order of Hon. Sherman D. Warner, Referee in Bankruptcy, made on July 5,1960, wherein he denied the bankrupts’ application for discharge.

The facts, as revealed by the record, are as follows: The bankrupts herein, Morris and Philip Weinstein, are father and son. On May 22, 1953 Philip Wein-stein, the son, and one Dorothy Younger, established the business of manufacturing womens’ coats and suits as co-partners under the name of Philip Weinstein & Co. at 237 West 37th Street, New York City. Philip Weinstein invested $35,000, borrowed from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Manley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Morimura, Arai & Co. v. TabackSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Industrial Bank of Commerce, Objecting Creditor-Appellant v. H. Woodruff Bissell, Bankrupt-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. Gerdes v. LustgartenSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. In the Matter of Joseph Di Palo, Bankrupt-Appellant, Lloyd G. Weinberger, Trustee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Weinstein v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API