Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided June 7, 1989No. 09-86-119 CRPublished

1DissentBurgess, Justice

I respectfully dissent. Under a TEX.R. APP.P. 81(b)(2) analysis, I am unable to determine, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the use of the parole instruction made no contribution to the punishment. Therefore, I would reverse for a new punishment hearing.

The majority enunciates a three-factor test under Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529, 552 (Tex.Crim.App.1988) (opinion on rehearing), as (1) curative instructions, (2) prior criminal record of the accused, and (3) aggravated and/or heinous facts. In an attempt to comply with this three-factor test, the majority finds there was a strong and clear…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Morris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  3. Howell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  4. Shorten v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1989
  5. Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API