Johnson v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1DissentBurgess, Justice
I respectfully dissent. Under a TEX.R. APP.P. 81(b)(2) analysis, I am unable to determine, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the use of the parole instruction made no contribution to the punishment. Therefore, I would reverse for a new punishment hearing.
The majority enunciates a three-factor test under Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529, 552 (Tex.Crim.App.1988) (opinion on rehearing), as (1) curative instructions, (2) prior criminal record of the accused, and (3) aggravated and/or heinous facts. In an attempt to comply with this three-factor test, the majority finds there was a strong and clear…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Morris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Howell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Shorten v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1989
- Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989