Legal Opinion
Danforth v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 26, 2005No. A04-1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge. *
Appellant moved for postconviction relief under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). The district court denied his motion, and he appeals from that denial.
FACTS
At the trial of appellant Stephen Dan-forth in 1996, the jury was shown a videotaped interview of a child victim who had been ruled unavailable to testify and whom appellant had never had the opportunity to cross-examine. The jury found appellant guilty of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. His conviction became final 1 on July 28, 1999, when the supreme court denied…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Marcus Mungo v. George DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Rodney Clay Evans v. Allen Luebbers, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ennis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Danforth v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Danforth v. CristCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Danforth v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Ennis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006